See how Vivo X200 Pro stacks against Samsung S25 Ultra in display and speed.
Quick Links
Both Vivo and Samsung are pushing boundaries in the flagship segment. With the Vivo X200 Pro and Samsung S25 Ultra, users get premium smartphones packed with cutting-edge technology. But which one delivers better value for your needs? This comparison covers everything — specifications, camera, performance, software, and pricing — to help you make an informed decision.
Both devices bring flagship hardware, but Samsung edges ahead in productivity, while Vivo pushes optical innovation.
| Specification |
Vivo X200 Pro |
Samsung S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Display |
6.78-inch 2K AMOLED, 120Hz |
6.8-inch QHD+ AMOLED 2X, 120Hz |
| Processor |
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 |
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 |
| RAM & Storage |
Up to 16 GB + 1 TB |
Up to 16 GB + 1 TB |
| Rear Camera Setup |
50 MP (main) + 50 MP (ultra-wide) + 50 MP (telephoto) |
200 MP + 50 MP + 12 MP + 10 MP |
| Front Camera |
32 MP |
40 MP |
| Battery |
5400 mAh |
5000 mAh |
| Charging |
100W wired, 50W wireless |
45W wired, 15W wireless |
| OS |
OriginOS 15 (Android 15) |
One UI 7 (Android 15) |
| IP Rating |
IP68 |
IP68 |
Disclaimer: The specifications mentioned above are based on the information available on the official website. Features may vary depending on model, configuration, and region. For the latest and most accurate details, please visit the official website or consult authorised retailers.
Both smartphones offer premium materials, but Samsung maintains a more functional look, while Vivo brings a sleeker, photography-first feel.
| Feature |
Vivo X200 Pro |
Samsung S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Frame Material |
Aluminium alloy |
Titanium alloy |
| Back Material |
Glass (Matte or Vegan Leather options) |
Gorilla Glass Armor |
| Dimensions |
Approx. 164.1 x 74.5 x 8.9 mm |
Approx. 163.4 x 78.1 x 8.9 mm |
| Weight |
~214 g |
~232 g |
| Distinct Features |
Sleek curves, large circular camera island |
Boxy design, S Pen embedded |
Photography is a highlight for both, but Samsung offers greater flexibility with its 200 MP sensor and periscope zoom, while Vivo excels in optical clarity and Zeiss tuning.
| Camera Feature |
Vivo X200 Pro |
Samsung S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main Camera |
50 MP (1-inch sensor, f/1.8) |
200 MP (OIS, Laser AF) |
| Ultra-Wide Camera |
50 MP |
50 MP |
| Telephoto Camera |
50 MP (4.3x optical, Zeiss lens) |
12 MP (3x) + 10 MP (10x periscope) |
| Front Camera |
32 MP |
40 MP |
| Features |
Zeiss optics, T* coating, 8K video |
AI Nightography, 8K video, Pro mode |
Both phones deliver powerful performance, but differ in thermal handling and charging speed.
| Category |
Vivo X200 Pro |
Samsung S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset |
Dimensity 9400 (4nm) |
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 (4nm) |
| RAM & Storage |
Up to 16 GB + 1 TB |
Up to 16 GB + 1 TB |
| Battery Capacity |
5400 mAh |
5000 mAh |
| Charging |
100W wired, 50W wireless |
45W wired, 15W wireless |
| Gaming & Thermals |
Strong with vapour chamber cooling |
Optimised with better sustained output |
Samsung brings a clean, feature-rich Android experience with long-term support, while Vivo offers a highly customised interface with camera-specific tweaks.
| Feature Area |
Vivo X200 Pro |
Samsung S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| UI Version |
OriginOS 15 (Android 15) |
One UI 7 (Android 15) |
| Notable Features |
Zeiss Camera UI, Custom gestures |
S Pen, Samsung DeX, AI Translate |
| Update Policy |
4 years OS + 5 years security |
7 years OS + security |
| Stylus Support |
No |
Yes (built-in) |
| Ecosystem Support |
Moderate (Vivo Watch, TWS) |
Strong (Tab, Watch, SmartThings) |
The pricing varies based on configurations. Vivo is more aggressive, while Samsung targets the premium segment.
| Variant |
Vivo X200 Pro (Approx. Price) |
Samsung S25 Ultra (Approx. Price) |
|---|---|---|
| 12 GB + 256 GB |
₹74,999 |
₹1,29,999 |
| 16 GB + 512 GB |
₹84,999 |
₹1,39,999 |
| 16 GB + 1 TB |
₹94,999 |
₹1,54,999 |
Disclaimer: Prices are approximate and may vary based on configuration, region, and special offers. Please check the official website for the most up-to-date pricing.
Choose the Vivo X200 Pro if:
You value fast charging and longer battery life
Photography, especially portraits and low-light, is a priority
You want flagship-level performance under ₹1 Lakh
Choose the Samsung S25 Ultra if:
You need stylus support for note-taking or sketching
Zoom photography and 7-year updates are valuable
You prefer a productivity-first flagship with a complete ecosystem
Both are excellent devices — the Vivo X200 Pro is for camera-first users and enthusiasts, while the Samsung S25 Ultra is built for professionals seeking performance and longevity.
Purchasing either of these flagships can be easier with the Bajaj Finserv Insta EMI Card. Here’s how:
You can access a pre-approved card loan amount of up to ₹3 Lakhs, allowing you to convert your smartphone purchase into easy monthly instalments.
The card is accepted at over 1.5 Lakh partner stores, both online and offline, making it convenient for smartphone shopping.
Choose a flexible repayment tenor of up to 60 months, depending on your financial comfort.
Enjoy easy EMIs with options like zero down payment and no-cost EMI plans at select retailers.
Samsung offers an integrated S Pen, better zoom capabilities, and longer software support, while Vivo focuses on photography and faster charging.
Yes, for those who value stylus input, ecosystem support, and software longevity. Otherwise, Vivo delivers excellent value.
Samsung excels in zoom and versatility; Vivo leads in portrait clarity and low-light performance due to Zeiss optics.
Yes, Vivo offers 100W wired and 50W wireless charging — significantly faster than Samsung’s 45W and 15W support.
Both use high-resolution AMOLED panels with 120Hz refresh, but Samsung edges ahead with brightness and QHD+ resolution.
Yes, thanks to its ease of use, sleek design, powerful camera, and faster charging at a more affordable price.