Explore how proposed direct‑tax changes intersect with health‑insurance benefits, slabs/exemptions, and compliance.
Last updated on: Jun 12, 2026
Direct taxes play a major role in India’s public finances. They help fund salaries, welfare schemes, defence spending, and infrastructure. A strong direct tax system also supports fairness, because tax is collected more directly from individuals and businesses with the capacity to pay. In recent years, India has moved steadily towards a simpler, more digital, and more taxpayer-friendly structure.
The direct tax system is the part of the tax framework where tax is paid directly by the person or entity on whom it is levied. In India, this includes income tax, corporate tax, TDS, TCS, securities transaction tax, equalisation levy, and other direct taxes. The system is administered by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, and it is now moving into a new legal framework with the Income Tax Act, 2025, which will come into force on 1 April 2026.
Direct tax reform is not only about changing rates. It is also about making the system easier to understand, easier to comply with, and harder to misuse. A modern tax system should reduce confusion for taxpayers, improve certainty for businesses, and widen the compliance base over time. India’s recent reforms have been moving in that direction through digital filing, faceless processes, and a simpler statutory framework.
The case for reform is strong because the tax base has improved, but it still needs to become broader and more efficient. The latest Economic Survey highlights that gross tax revenue is 11.5% of GDP and income-tax returns filed have risen to 9.2 Crore. So, the focus has shifted from only collecting more to collecting better, with less friction.
The earlier system referred to a possible simplification around a ₹5 Lakhs exemption and five slabs. Currently, the direct tax structure has already changed significantly. The Union Budget 2024 revised the new-regime slabs as follows:
Income Range (₹) |
Tax Rate |
0 – 3,00,000 |
Nil |
3,00,001 – 7,00,000 |
5% |
7,00,001 – 10,00,000 |
10% |
10,00,001 – 12,00,000 |
15% |
12,00,001 – 15,00,000 |
20% |
Above 15,00,000 |
30% |
The Union Budget 2025 then went further and announced that no personal income tax is payable up to ₹12 Lakhs (or ₹12.75 Lakhs for salaried taxpayers), under the new regime.
A much bigger structural change is also underway. The government has already notified the Income-tax Act, 2025, and the official CBDT FAQs say it replaces the Income-tax Act, 1961 with effect from 1 April 2026. The Income-tax Rules, 2026 have also been notified to come into force from the same date. This is one of the most important direct tax reforms in decades.
One of the most visible benefits of recent reform is greater tax relief for individuals. The government has expanded relief under the new regime, and Budget 2025-26 announced that no personal income tax is payable up to ₹12 Lakhs, or up to ₹12.75 Lakhs for salaried taxpayers. That is a major shift from the older structure and gives middle-income taxpayers more breathing space.
This matters for three reasons:
It improves household cash flow.
It supports consumption and savings.
It makes the tax system feel less punitive for compliant taxpayers.
In practical terms, people keep more of what they earn, and that can strengthen financial planning across households.
A complicated tax law creates confusion. It also creates room for mistakes, delays, and disputes. The move to the Income Tax Act, 2025 is important because it replaces the long-standing 1961 framework with a more updated structure. The transition framework also shows that old and new provisions will operate for different tax years, which should help with continuity during the changeover.
The value of simplification is easy to understand. A shorter, clearer law is easier for taxpayers to follow. It is also easier for tax administrators to apply consistently. Over time, that can reduce the number of cases where interpretation becomes the main problem rather than the facts themselves.
India has already moved strongly towards digital tax administration. Faceless assessment is one of the biggest changes. Under this system, taxpayers and officers do not meet in person, and the process is handled electronically. That reduces the scope for arbitrary behaviour, local pressure, and unnecessary interface.
This shift has real benefits:
It increases transparency.
It reduces human discretion.
It speeds up routine administration.
It lowers the risk of harassment for honest taxpayers.
Technology-led tax administration is not just convenient. It is also a strong anti-corruption tool.
A healthy direct tax system depends on more than tax rates. It depends on how many people and businesses are actually part of the system. The latest official economic data shows that income-tax returns filed reached 9.2 Crore in FY25. That indicates a broader compliance footprint than in earlier years.
This is important because a wider base helps the government collect revenue more stably. It also reduces the burden of dependence on a relatively small set of taxpayers. In a large economy like India, long-term tax reform must focus on widening participation rather than only changing rates.
Another major benefit of direct tax reform is stronger information matching. When tax systems are connected, under-reporting becomes harder. GST data, income-tax reporting, and other financial records can be cross-checked more effectively. That makes it more difficult to hide transactions or report inconsistent income.
This has several practical effects:
It improves detection of mismatches.
It reduces leakages.
It increases the quality of compliance checks.
It supports cleaner tax administration.
A system that can verify data automatically is usually more efficient than one that depends too heavily on manual checking.
India’s tax system has long struggled with litigation. That remains one of the biggest pain points for both taxpayers and the government. Reforms aim to reduce disputes by simplifying the law, increasing automation, and making assessment and appeal processes more structured.
The benefit of lower litigation is substantial:
Taxpayers get more certainty.
Businesses can plan with less fear of future disputes.
Courts and tribunals face less pressure.
The tax department can focus more on compliance and enforcement.
A simpler law usually creates fewer interpretive disputes. That is why reform and litigation reduction are closely linked.
Another benefit of reform is that it gives the tax system a clearer long-term direction. India is not only updating rates and procedures. It is rebuilding the legal framework itself. The new Income Tax Act, 2025 creates a cleaner basis for future policy changes, future updates, and future digital systems.
That matters because tax policy should not keep relying on patchwork fixes. A modern economy needs a tax structure that can evolve with changing employment patterns, digital business models, and rising transaction volumes.
When tax relief is better designed, households and businesses retain more disposable income. That can support spending, investment, and savings. A fairer direct tax structure also improves trust in the system. People are usually more willing to comply when they believe the burden is reasonable and the process is transparent.
This is one of the main benefits of reform in India. It is not just about collecting tax. It is about collecting it in a way that is simpler, more trusted, and more sustainable over time.
Direct tax reform in India is moving in the right direction. The latest changes show a clear shift towards simplification, digital administration, wider compliance, and greater taxpayer relief. The transition from the Income Tax Act, 1961 to the Income Tax Act, 2025 is the biggest structural change in decades, and the newer tax relief rules have made the system more supportive for individuals as well.
Reviewer
The Direct Tax Code focuses on reducing tax rates and simplifying tax laws. It aims to create a fair, efficient taxation system, ensuring transparency and minimizing disputes between taxpayers and the government.
Direct tax is generally good as it promotes fairness and funds public services. However, it can be challenging for higher income groups and may discourage investment.
Yes, Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) is considered a direct tax. TDS is collected directly from the taxpayer's source of income.