Discover how Xiaomi 14 CIVI compares with Samsung Galaxy S23 in build, camera capabilities, and day-to-day performance.
Choosing between the Xiaomi 14 CIVI and Samsung S23 can feel daunting. Both models offer flagship power, sleek design and impressive cameras. In this comparison article, we break down specs, design, performance, software, price and more to help you decide which suits your needs best.
Both phones boast cutting‑edge internals. Xiaomi uses Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, while Samsung runs Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. Key specs are compared below:
Specification |
Xiaomi 14 CIVI |
Samsung Galaxy S23 |
---|---|---|
SoC |
Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, up to Cortex‑X4 @3.0 GHz |
Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, up to Cortex‑X3 @3.36 GHz |
RAM & Storage |
8 GB/256 GB, 12 GB/512 GB (LPDDR5X/UFS 4.0) |
8 GB (128–512 GB) LPDDR5X with UFS 3.1–4.0 |
Display |
6.55″ 1.5K quad‑curve AMOLED, 120 Hz, 3000 nits |
6.1″ Dynamic AMOLED 2X, FHD+, 120 Hz, 1750 nits |
Battery |
4,700 mAh with fast charging |
3,900 mAh, 25 W wired, wireless charging |
Weight |
179.3 g |
168 g |
Disclaimer: Specifications sourced from official websites and third‑party listings; subject to change.
Both smartphones feature a modern aesthetic with high-quality materials and polished finishes. The Xiaomi 14 CIVI and Samsung Galaxy S23 are designed to offer a premium in-hand experience. While they differ in approach—curved versus flat edges—their build quality and durability reflect flagship-grade craftsmanship. Below is a closer look at their design elements:
Feature |
Xiaomi 14 CIVI |
Samsung Galaxy S23 |
---|---|---|
Dimensions |
157.2 × 72.7 × 7.5 mm |
146.3 × 70.9 × 7.6 mm (6.1″ model) |
Weight |
177.6 g (glass back) / 179.3 g (vegan leather) |
168 g |
Front protection |
Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
Back protection |
Gorilla Glass Victus 2 (glass variant) / vegan leather option |
Gorilla Glass Victus 2 on front and back |
Frame material |
Metal frame |
Armour aluminium frame |
Display style |
6.55″ quad‑curve floating AMOLED |
6.1″ flat Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
Refresh rate |
120 Hz |
120 Hz |
Peak brightness |
Up to 3,000 nits |
Up to 1,750 nits |
Water/dust resistance |
IP53 (splash-resistant) |
IP68 (up to 1.5 m for 30 min) |
Disclaimer: Data sourced directly from official Xiaomi and Samsung specifications. Actual experience may vary slightly across markets or variants.
Both phones feature powerful triple‑rear cameras. Xiaomi adds Leica collaboration for improved portrait and low‑light shots. Samsung offers a reliable 50 MP main, 10 MP telephoto and 12 MP ultrawide setup with 3x optical zoom. Below, find a detailed comparison:
Here’s a detailed comparison table sourced directly from the official Xiaomi and Samsung specifications:
Feature |
Xiaomi 14 CIVI (Leica-co-engineered) |
Samsung Galaxy S23 |
---|---|---|
Main (Wide) |
50 MP, f/1.63, 25 mm eq., OIS, 2.0 μm “Light Hunter 800” sensor |
50 MP, f/1.8, 85° FOV, PDAF & OIS |
Telephoto |
50 MP, f/1.98, 50 mm eq., 2× optical zoom |
10 MP, f/2.4, 70 mm eq., 3× optical zoom |
Ultra-wide |
12 MP, f/2.2, 15 mm eq., 120° FOV |
12 MP, f/2.2, 120° FOV |
Front Cameras |
Dual: 32 MP primary (f/2.0, 26 mm eq.) + 32 MP ultra-wide (f/2.4, 18 mm eq.) |
12 MP single cam, f/2.2, 80° FOV |
Digital Zoom |
Up to 20× |
Up to hybrid 3× optical + digital |
Rear Video Capabilities |
HDR, Ultra Night Video, Pro Time-lapse, slow motion; up to 4 K@60fps |
HDR video with stabilization up to 4 K; Super Steady feature |
Front Video |
4 K@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
4 K@30/60fps, Auto HDR |
Disclaimer: Camera specifications are sourced directly from the manufacturers’ official listings; actual performance may vary by region and software version.
Power and endurance set each handset apart. Xiaomi’s Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 offers new‑gen architecture and efficiency, with 4,700 mAh battery supporting long usage. Samsung’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 delivers top-tier performance, albeit with smaller 3,900 mAh battery. Let’s lay out the facts:
Aspect |
Xiaomi 14 CIVI |
Samsung Galaxy S23 |
---|---|---|
Chipset Performance |
Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 – fast single‑core speeds |
Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; overclocked Cortex‑X3 @3.36 GHz |
Battery Capacity |
4,700 mAh – 1600 charge cycles for longevity |
3,900 mAh – standard longevity |
Charging |
Fast wired charging (spec not official) |
25 W wired, Qi wireless, PowerShare |
Disclaimer: Battery performance and charging sourced from official specs and company statements.
Both phones run the latest Android 15, but offer distinct user experiences. Xiaomi’s HyperOS delivers smooth performance with creative Leica-inspired UI tweaks and Dolby Vision support. Samsung’s One UI 7 brings deeper integration, long-term update promise, and features like Knox security and PowerShare. The table below outlines key software differences:
Feature |
Xiaomi 14 CIVI (HyperOS) |
Samsung Galaxy S23 (One UI 7) |
---|---|---|
Operating System |
HyperOS based on Android 15 |
One UI 7 based on Android 15 |
AI Integration |
Advanced AI capabilities for smarter app suggestions |
Enhanced AI features for personalized user experience |
Multitasking |
Improved multitasking with split-screen enhancements |
Advanced multitasking features |
Privacy Settings |
Enhanced privacy controls |
Advanced privacy settings |
Ecosystem Integration |
Seamless integration with Xiaomi devices |
Deep integration with Samsung ecosystem |
Disclaimer: Features and specifications are based on official information from Xiaomi and Samsung. Actual user experience may vary.
Pricing plays a vital role when choosing between the Xiaomi 14 CIVI and Samsung Galaxy S23. Xiaomi positions its phone competitively, offering high-end specs at a mid-premium price. Samsung, being a flagship from an established brand, sits higher on the pricing ladder. Here’s a comparison of their current market prices:
Model |
India Price (approx.) |
---|---|
Xiaomi 14 CIVI 256 GB |
₹49,999–₹51,999 |
Xiaomi 14 CIVI 512 GB |
₹54,999–₹56,999 |
Samsung Galaxy S23 128 GB |
₹65,000–₹67,000 |
Samsung Galaxy S23 256 GB |
₹70,000–₹72,000 |
Disclaimer: Prices sourced from multiple price-tracking sites and deals; may vary by retailer and promotion.
If you prioritise screen quality, selfie cameras and battery life, the Xiaomi 14 CIVI is compelling. For longevity of software, brand support and a compact form, Samsung Galaxy S23 is ideal. Both deliver flagship performance, so your choice hinges on priorities: Xiaomi for multimedia, Samsung for updates.
Buying a smartphone is easier when you have access to flexible, no-cost payment options. The Bajaj Finserv Insta EMI Card makes premium devices more affordable. Explore the key benefits that make this card a smart choice for your next tech purchase:
Sure! Here are the benefits rewritten clearly and from scratch:
Convert your smartphone purchase into easy monthly instalments without paying any extra interest, making it budget-friendly.
Get immediate access to a pre-approved loan amount on your EMI card with minimal paperwork and quick digital onboarding.
Choose from multiple tenure options ranging from 3 to 24 months, tailored to your financial comfort.
Repay your EMIs ahead of schedule without worrying about penalties or hidden fees.
Use the card at over 1.5 lakh partner stores and leading e-commerce platforms across India for a seamless shopping experience.
The main difference is chipset and battery: Xiaomi uses Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 with larger 4,700 mAh battery; Samsung uses Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 and has 3,900 mAh cell.
Xiaomi typically costs ₹10,000–₹20,000 less than Samsung S23 for similar memory, while offering larger battery and selfie-focused features.
Yes. Xiaomi’s 4,700 mAh battery and efficient hardware give noticeably longer usage versus Samsung’s smaller 3,900 mAh pack.
Xiaomi’s 1.5 K quad‑curve AMOLED reaches 3000 nits peak brightness and Dolby Vision, whereas Samsung uses a flat 120 Hz FHD+ Dynamic AMOLED with 1750 nits.
Yes. Xiaomi offers two front selfie cameras (32 MP+32 MP), Dolby Vision support, and advanced cooling tech—features Samsung lacks.
If you crave better battery life, selfies, and a sharper display, yes. But if software updates and ecosystem stability matter more, Samsung remains strong.