See how Moto G35 and Redmi A4 stack up in display, speed, and battery to help you choose an affordable daily-use phone.
Comparing the Moto G35 and the Redmi A4 can help identify the better value-for-money smartphone in the budget segment. These two models offer distinct advantages depending on user preferences—whether for everyday tasks, gaming, or multimedia. This detailed comparison explores every key feature, including design, performance, camera, battery, and price, to help you understand which phone suits your needs.
Here is a quick comparison of the core specifications of Moto G35 and Redmi A4:
Feature |
Moto G35 |
Redmi A4 |
---|---|---|
Launch Date |
December 10, 2024 |
November 20, 2024 |
Display |
6.6-inch HD+ IPS LCD, 90Hz |
6.79-inch HD+ IPS LCD, 90Hz |
Processor |
MediaTek Helio G85 |
MediaTek Helio G36 |
RAM |
4 GB / 6 GB |
4 GB / 6 GB |
Storage |
64 GB / 128 GB |
128 GB |
Rear Camera |
50 MP Dual Camera |
8 MP Single Camera |
Front Camera |
8 MP |
5 MP |
Battery |
5,000 mAh, 18W charging |
5,000 mAh, 10W charging |
OS |
Android 14 |
Android 13 (Go Edition) |
Fingerprint Sensor |
Side-mounted |
Rear-mounted |
Disclaimer: The specifications mentioned above are based on the information available on the official website. Features may vary depending on model, configuration, and region. For the latest and most accurate details, please visit the official website or consult authorised retailers.
The Moto G35 has a clean matte finish and a flat frame, offering a modern and sturdy grip. The side-mounted fingerprint sensor and minimal camera bump add to its ergonomic build.
Redmi A4, in contrast, has a slightly taller design with curved edges. It opts for a rear-mounted fingerprint sensor and retains a plastic back panel typical of budget devices.
Attribute |
Moto G35 |
Redmi A4 |
---|---|---|
Build Material |
Plastic back, plastic frame |
Plastic back, plastic frame |
Fingerprint Sensor |
Side-mounted |
Rear-mounted |
Weight |
Approx. 185g |
Approx. 192g |
Dimensions |
163.9 x 75 x 8.2 mm |
168.8 x 76.4 x 8.3 mm |
The Moto G35 offers a dual-camera setup with a 50 MP primary sensor that performs well in daylight and casual photography. Its 8 MP front camera also delivers decent selfies with software-based enhancements.
Redmi A4 comes with a single 8 MP rear camera and a basic 5 MP front camera, both aimed at first-time smartphone users with minimal photography needs.
Feature |
Moto G35 |
Redmi A4 |
---|---|---|
Primary Camera |
50 MP (main) + 2 MP (depth) |
8 MP (main) |
Front Camera |
8 MP |
5 MP |
Video Recording |
1080p @ 30fps (front & rear) |
1080p @ 30fps (rear only) |
Camera Features |
HDR, Night Mode, Portrait |
HDR, AI Beautify |
When it comes to processing power, the Moto G35 holds an edge with the MediaTek Helio G85 chipset. It handles multitasking better and offers smoother gameplay at moderate settings. It also runs on Android 14 with fewer pre-installed apps, offering a cleaner experience.
Redmi A4 is powered by the Helio G36 and runs on Android 13 Go Edition, which is a lightweight version of Android built for entry-level devices. While it performs adequately for basic usage, it lags behind in resource-heavy tasks.
Feature |
Moto G35 |
Redmi A4 |
---|---|---|
Chipset |
MediaTek Helio G85 |
MediaTek Helio G36 |
RAM & Storage |
4 GB / 6 GB; 64 GB / 128 GB |
4 GB / 6 GB; 128 GB |
Battery Capacity |
5,000 mAh |
5,000 mAh |
Charging |
18W fast charging |
10W standard charging |
OS |
Android 14 |
Android 13 Go Edition |
Both models include essential features like dual SIM support, a 3.5mm audio jack, and a dedicated microSD card slot. However, the Moto G35 offers a cleaner UI experience, security updates, and more efficient RAM management.
Feature |
Moto G35 |
Redmi A4 |
---|---|---|
Operating System |
Android 14 (near-stock) |
Android 13 Go Edition |
Audio |
3.5mm Jack, Single Speaker |
3.5mm Jack, Single Speaker |
Storage Expansion |
microSD up to 1 TB |
microSD up to 1 TB |
Additional Features |
Face Unlock, Moto Gestures |
Face Unlock, AI Noise Reduction |
Both smartphones are positioned in the budget segment and are affordably priced. However, the Moto G35 tends to be priced slightly higher due to its superior chipset and dual camera.
Variant |
Motorola G35 5G |
Redmi A4 5G |
---|---|---|
4 GB + 64 GB |
- |
₹8,499 |
4 GB + 128 GB |
₹9,999 |
₹9,499 |
6 GB + 128 GB |
- |
₹9,799 |
Disclaimer: Prices are approximate and may vary based on configuration, region, and special offers. Please check the official website for the most up-to-date pricing.
The Moto G35 delivers better performance, a cleaner Android experience, and a more capable camera system. It is ideal for users looking for a slightly more powerful device within a budget. Redmi A4, on the other hand, suits first-time smartphone users or those with very basic needs, such as calling, messaging, and casual browsing.
If performance and camera quality are important, the Moto G35 may be worth the slight price bump. For ultra-budget users, Redmi A4 remains a sensible choice.
Shoppers looking to buy either phone on EMI can consider the Bajaj Finserv Insta EMI Card for these reasons:
Pre-approved card loan limit of up to ₹3 Lakhs can be used for phones, appliances, and more
Accepted at over 1.5 Lakh stores, both online and offline, for wide purchase flexibility
Repayment tenor can extend up to 60 months, offering budget-friendly instalments
Enables quick purchases with minimal documentation and simple EMI conversion
The Moto G35 has a better processor, higher-resolution cameras, and cleaner Android 14, while the Redmi A4 runs on a lighter Android Go version and offers a single 8 MP camera.
For users prioritising performance and photography, the Moto G35 may justify its higher cost with improved specifications and faster charging.
Yes, the Moto G35 supports 18W fast charging, while the Redmi A4 supports only 10W charging.
The Moto G35 features a 50 MP dual camera setup that outperforms the single 8 MP shooter of the Redmi A4, especially in daylight shots.
Redmi A4 can handle lightweight games but may struggle with graphic-heavy apps. Moto G35 offers better gaming performance due to its superior chipset.