Our Products
Loans
Cards
Insurance
Investment
Stock Market
Electronics Mall
CIBIL Score
Knowledge Centre
Calculators
Our Services
My Account
Do not call
En
Securities markets operate within a legal and regulatory framework that governs disclosures, trading conduct, and information flow. Within this framework, certain practices are classified as securities fraud due to their non-compliance with disclosure requirements and market conduct standards.
Securities fraud refers to deceptive or misleading practices connected to securities such as shares, bonds, or other market-linked instruments. It involves the misrepresentation, omission, or falsification of information that is required to be disclosed under securities laws. Such conduct interferes with the integrity of price discovery, disclosure, and fair dealing mechanisms that govern capital markets.
Securities fraud may be committed by a range of market participants, including listed companies, promoters, directors, intermediaries, analysts, or other persons with access to material information. These actions are considered unlawful because they breach disclosure obligations, distort market transparency, and violate regulatory provisions designed to ensure orderly functioning of securities markets. In India, such conduct is addressed under securities laws and regulations administered by the market regulator.
Securities fraud can take multiple forms depending on the nature of the misconduct and the market segment involved. Commonly identified categories include misrepresentation of financial statements, suppression of material information, misuse of unpublished price-sensitive information, and dissemination of false or misleading market disclosures. These practices are assessed based on their impact on market fairness and compliance with disclosure norms.
In India, securities fraud is regulated under the framework administered by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI). The regulatory framework includes disclosure requirements, surveillance mechanisms, investigation powers, and enforcement provisions under applicable regulations, including those relating to fraudulent and unfair trade practices. Regulatory action may arise from market monitoring, inspections, or examination of disclosures and trading activity.
In legal and regulatory proceedings, the elements of securities fraud are used to assess whether conduct involving securities amounts to a violation under applicable laws and regulations.
Across jurisdictions, securities fraud is commonly assessed through a set of foundational legal elements that establish the presence of deceptive conduct in relation to securities:
Misrepresentation or Omission
The communication of false information or the failure to disclose material information required to be disclosed.
Materiality
The information involved must relate to a fact considered significant within the context of securities disclosure and market transparency.
Intent or Fault Standard
In many legal frameworks, fraud assessment examines whether the conduct involved intent to deceive, manipulate, or defraud, or whether it arose from reckless or negligent behaviour.
Reliance
Certain legal regimes consider whether market participants acted based on the misrepresented or omitted information, particularly in private enforcement actions.
Loss or Damage
The presence of quantifiable loss or adverse impact arising from the alleged fraudulent conduct may form part of the assessment, depending on the nature of the proceeding.
These elements collectively form the analytical framework used to evaluate allegations of securities fraud under statutory and judicial standards.
In the Indian context, the application of the elements of securities fraud is shaped by the regulatory approach adopted by the Securities and Exchange Board of India under the SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices) Regulations, 2003.
Under this framework, regulatory action does not always require demonstration of investor reliance or proof of intent in civil enforcement proceedings. Liability may arise from acts of omission, misstatements, or non-disclosure of material information, even where such conduct results from negligence rather than deliberate intent. The emphasis is placed on market integrity, disclosure standards, and the effect of conduct on the securities market as a whole, rather than on individual investor behaviour alone.
Securities fraud can take various forms depending on the nature of the misconduct and the market involved. Common securities fraud examples include:
Insider trading: Trading in securities based on unpublished, price-sensitive information.
Pump and dump schemes: Dissemination of misleading or false information to artificially increase a security’s price, followed by sale of holdings.
Ponzi schemes: Use of funds from new participants to meet obligations to earlier participants, without underlying legitimate investment activity.
Accounting fraud: Manipulation or misstatement of financial records, such as overstating revenues or concealing liabilities.
These practices are examined and addressed under securities laws due to their effect on disclosure standards and market transparency.
Several notable cases of securities frauds in India have been examined under the country’s regulatory and legal framework. These cases are frequently cited in discussions on market regulation and enforcement history:
Harshad Mehta case (1992): Involved misuse of banking instruments to influence stock market transactions.
Satyam Computer Services case (2009): Related to misrepresentation of financial statements and accounting irregularities.
Karvy Stock Broking case (2019): Involved unauthorised use of client securities held in demat accounts.
In India, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) functions as the primary regulatory authority responsible for investigating such matters, issuing directions, and enforcing compliance with securities laws.
The statute of limitations refers to the period within which regulatory or legal action relating to securities fraud may be initiated, as determined by applicable laws and regulatory provisions.
In India: Timelines for regulatory action may vary depending on the nature of proceedings, with certain matters governed by limitation principles under securities laws, adjudication rules, or judicial interpretation.
In the United States: Federal securities laws generally prescribe a limitation period of two years from discovery of the violation or five years from the date of occurrence, whichever is earlier.
Limitation periods define procedural boundaries for enforcement and adjudication within securities regulation.
Securities fraud affects multiple participants within the securities market ecosystem, including investors, intermediaries, and issuers, by disrupting the flow of accurate information and normal market functioning.
From a transactional perspective, investments made on the basis of inaccurate, incomplete, or misleading disclosures may result in financial discrepancies for both individual and institutional investors. Beyond direct financial exposure, such instances can influence broader market confidence, as trust in disclosures, pricing mechanisms, and market conduct becomes affected.
Securities fraud may also coincide with observable changes in market behaviour, including shifts in trading activity following regulatory disclosures, investigations, or enforcement actions. These developments can extend beyond the securities directly involved and influence overall market sentiment.
Resolution of securities fraud typically involves formal legal and regulatory processes, including investigation, adjudication, and enforcement under applicable securities laws. As a result, the effects of securities fraud are examined not only at the investor level but also within the wider framework of market regulation, compliance, and investor protection systems.
The prevention of securities fraud and its detection operate as parallel functions within market regulation, with preventive controls aimed at reducing misconduct and detection mechanisms focused on identifying violations that occur despite these safeguards.
Preventive measures are embedded within the regulatory and compliance framework governing securities markets. These measures are designed to reduce the likelihood of fraudulent conduct through structured disclosure and oversight requirements.
Mandatory disclosures: Listed entities are required to make periodic and event-based disclosures to ensure timely availability of material information.
Audit frameworks: Internal controls and statutory audits are used to assess the accuracy and consistency of financial reporting.
Compliance systems: Market intermediaries and listed entities maintain compliance policies aligned with applicable securities laws and regulations.
Regulatory supervision: In India, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) prescribes preventive norms, conducts inspections, and issues regulatory directions to address gaps in compliance.
Whistleblower frameworks: Formal reporting mechanisms allow potential misconduct to be brought to the attention of regulators and oversight bodies.
Detection mechanisms focus on identifying instances of securities fraud through monitoring, analysis, and investigative processes after or during market activity.
Market surveillance systems: Stock exchanges and regulators use automated tools to monitor trading patterns and identify irregular activity.
Data analysis and reporting reviews: Financial filings and transaction data are examined to detect inconsistencies or unexplained deviations.
Investigations and inspections: Regulatory authorities initiate inquiries based on surveillance alerts, complaints, or supervisory findings.
Inter-agency coordination: Information sharing between regulators, exchanges, and enforcement bodies supports identification of complex or cross-market violations.
Effective market oversight relies on the ongoing interaction between preventive controls and detection systems, supported by continuous regulatory vigilance.
Securities fraud represents a category of prohibited conduct addressed under securities laws and regulatory frameworks governing financial markets. Its definition, constituent elements, and documented cases provide context on how disclosure standards, trading practices, and enforcement mechanisms operate within regulated markets. Regulatory oversight, investigative processes, and enforcement actions collectively define how securities fraud is addressed to maintain orderly market functioning and compliance with applicable laws.
This content is for informational purposes only and the same should not be construed as investment advice. Bajaj Finserv Direct Limited shall not be liable or responsible for any investment decision that you may take based on this content.
Common types of securities fraud include insider trading, Ponzi schemes, pump and dump operations, falsification of financial statements, and dissemination of misleading information affecting securities prices.
Securities fraud involves misrepresentation, omission, or deceptive disclosures, while market manipulation generally refers to trading practices intended to create artificial price movements without necessarily involving false disclosures.
In India, limitation periods for securities fraud matters vary based on the nature of proceedings and applicable legal provisions, with timelines shaped by regulatory rules and judicial interpretation.
Regulators use disclosure reviews, market surveillance systems, audits, inspections, and whistleblower inputs to identify and address instances of securities fraud under applicable enforcement mechanisms.
Penalties for securities fraud may include monetary penalties, disgorgement of unlawful gains, suspension or cancellation of registrations, market access restrictions, or criminal liability, depending on the legal framework and jurisdiction.
Securities fraud can occur in markets where securities are issued or traded, including equity markets, debt markets, derivatives markets, and commodity-linked securities markets.
Securities fraud specifically relates to deceptive practices involving securities and capital markets, whereas general financial fraud may involve broader financial activities such as banking, lending, or payment systems outside the securities framework.
Securities fraud in India is governed by laws and regulations such as the SEBI Act, 1992; the SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices) Regulations, 2003; and relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.
In India, securities fraud cases are primarily overseen by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), with stock exchanges and other enforcement authorities playing supporting roles as per jurisdiction and case nature.
Securities fraud is considered a serious market offence because it undermines market integrity, distorts price discovery, and affects confidence in the fairness and transparency of securities markets.
.jpeg)
250 Views
| 1min read
Posted on 19 Dec
146916
Unlock the world of credit! From picking the perfect card to savvy loan management, navigate wisely.
96679
Money Management and Financial Planning covers personal finance basics, setting goals, budgeting...
28344
Explore the investment cosmos! From beginner's guides to sharp-witted strategies, explore India's treasure trove of options.
35375
Navigate the tax maze with ease! Uncover Income Tax 101, demystify jargon with Terms for Beginners, and choose between Old or New Regimes.
18725
Discover essential insights on various types of insurance in India.
4553
Welcome to Tech in Finance, where we explore the exciting intersection of technology and finance...
Academy 
.jpeg "image not found"){kind=small}
